Evaluation of Cyclophosphamide/GVAX Pancreas Followed by Listeria-mesothelin (CRS-207) With or Without Nivolumab in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer.
Evaluation of Cyclophosphamide/GVAX Pancreas Followed by Listeria-mesothelin (CRS-207) With or Without Nivolumab in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer.
Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Apr 09;:
Authors: Tsujikawa T, Crocenzi T, Durham JN, Sugar EA, Wu AA, Onners B, Nauroth JM, Anders RA, Fertig EJ, Laheru DA, Reiss K, Vonderheide RH, Ko AH, Tempero MA, Fisher GA, Considine M, Danilova L, Brockstedt DG, Coussens LM, Jaffee EM, Le DT
Abstract
PURPOSE: Two studies in previously-treated metastatic pancreatic cancer have been completed combining GVAX pancreas vaccine (granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor-secreting allogeneic pancreatic tumor cells) with cyclophosphamide (Cy) and CRS-207 (live, attenuated Listeria monocytogenes expressing mesothelin). In the current study, we compared Cy/GVAX followed by CRS-207 with (Arm A) or without nivolumab (Arm B).
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who received one prior therapy for metastatic disease and RECIST measurable disease were randomized 1:1 to receive treatment on Arm A or Arm B. The primary objective was to compare overall survival (OS) between the arms. Additional objectives included assessment of progression-free survival, safety, tumor responses, CA19-9 responses and immunologic correlates.
RESULTS: Ninety-three patients were treated (Arm A, 51; Arm B, 42). The median OS in Arms A and B were 5.9 (95% CI, 4.7, 8.6) and 6.1 (95% CI, 3.5, 7.0) months, respectively, with a hazard ratio 0.86 (95% CI, 0.55, 1.34). Objective responses were seen in three patients using immune-related response criteria (4%, 2/51, Arm A; 2%, 1/42, Arm B). The <underline>><underline> grade 3 related adverse event rate while higher in Arm A (35.3% vs 11.9%) was manageable. Changes in the microenvironment, including increase in CD8+ T cells and a decrease in CD68+ myeloid cells, were observed in long-term survivors in Arm A only.
CONCLUSIONS: While the study did not meet its primary endpoint of improvement in OS of Arm A over Arm B, the OS was comparable to standard therapy. Objective responses and immunologic changes in the tumor microenvironment were evident.
PMID: 32273276 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]